Political Economy Analyses: Prioritization of Maternal and Newborn Health in Conflict-Affected Contexts
Utilizing the health policy triangle as a guiding framework, these studies examined the interplay of political, economic, and health system factors shaping MNH prioritization in each context. During a recent webinar co-hosted by the EQUAL research consortium, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), and the Interagency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG), researchers from each context shared key insights from their respective studies.
Recurring themes emerged. While MNH is considered a priority issue with robust policy frameworks and initiatives in place, implementation is impeded by a number of factors including resource constraints, health workforce shortages, and competing health and other political priorities. In each setting, the outsized role of international donors and partners in agenda-setting and financing raises concerns about MNH programs sustainability without stronger localization agenda and actions.
Speakers shed light on the complex challenges created by the dynamics of crisis and fragility. From safety and security risks faced by health workers to the destruction of health infrastructure and the logistical challenges of accessibility, each context experiences distinct obstacles to effective MNH service delivery. As we navigate these complexities, it is evident that addressing MNH in conflict-affected regions demands tailored, context-specific strategies and concerted efforts to mobilize resources and support from both local and global stakeholders.
Policy briefs summarizing the findings and recommendations from each study offer actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders alike. Additionally, a recording of the research dissemination webinar provides a deeper dive into the study findings with reflections from each study team.
The Policy Briefs can be found here:
Summary of PEA findings by location: